Thursday, December 1, 2011

Rodger Cook: more Republican cliches and talking points

WSIL (Fanna Haile-Selassie & Randy Livingston) did a profile on Rodger Cook, Republican candidate in IL-12.


"I'm the most conservative person in this race, both fiscally and socially."
OK. What does it mean to be fiscally "conservative"? In the real world "fiscal conservatism" looks like stuffing money the pockets of rich people while loading debt onto the middle class... and then whining about the debt "conservatives" created is somehow the responsibility of Democrats.

And the corporate media, like WSIL, passes along the idea that Democrats create debt without even an asterix noting the claim is untrue.

And what is being the "most socially conservative"? Does he do crystal meth with males prostitutes like so many of the leaders of the social conservative movement? Of is he for returning to Jim Crow laws? Maybe he wants to take away the right of women to vote?

"We need to send people like me that don't care about if you're democrat or a republican, I'm a conservative."
As most sixth graders know "Democrat" and "Republican" are proper nouns and therefore should be capitalized.


then spent the rest of his years as a banking and consulting businessman.
It seems like this should be explained better.

Cook supports domestic oil drilling and coal mining, especially in southern Illinois. Easing energy regulations is one of his top goals,


Didn't we just have an oil man president, an oil man vice president and a Republican Congress? How did it work to let the fossil fuel industry to rule the roost in Washington?

"You know what happens when you cut taxes? The people that earn it get to keep the money, spend it, invest it, create jobs with it," he explains.
Again, hasn't this approach been tried? What we got was a bunch of rich people and corporations getting richer and investing their money in businesses that move money around, but don't produce goods and services.

On paper the GDP is up. But in the real world, the economy sucks by every measure that matters to regular folk.

Tuesday, November 29, 2011

Breaking: Brad Harriman has a website

It's a big white screen (did I mention I have a new 23" monitor?) and in the upper left hand corner in twelve point New Times Roman is says, "Under Construction." It might only be ten point font.

WSIL is part of the Jason Plummer PR team

I feel obligated to comment on "Plummer Eyes Seat in Congress" (WSIL, Emily Finnegan).

Both the Republican and Democratic fields are already crowded;
"Crowded" is a subjective word. I don't think two serious candidates (Harriman and Miller, plus a perennial candidate*) makes the Democratic primary crowded. The choice is clear for Democrats. Harriman is an inept apparatchik and Chris Miller is a nose-to-the-grindstone Army veteran who has been advocating for sensible government policies.

"I think people are looking for a little it of a new direction," Plummer said.

Jason Plummer is right that people want a new direction. But he's implying the the Republicans are offering something new and the corporate media is serving as a microphone stand.

What new policies is Plummer advocating? We've tried the whole "give more money to rich people" policies. Remember the Bush years where the Republicans controlled Congress, the executive branch and the Supreme Court? How did that work out?
The 29-year-old from O'Fallon hopes to be that new direction in the 12th district.
What is Plummer advocating that's new? Seriously. WSIL is basically packaging Republican press release as news.


... a shift toward more conservative ideals mean people are looking for a change.


 You notice how the corporate media makes it sound like there's some groundswell of support for "conservative" policies without ever saying what these "conservative" policies are?

"I think right now the size and scope of government has grown beyond all intents and purposes that anyone would have ever imagined the federal government would be," he told News Three.

Which government policies would Plummer cut? Oh, that's right, "News" Three didn't ask. You notice how "Propaganda" Three didn't mention how Republicans vastly expanded federal spending the last time the Republicans controlled government. Guess it didn't fit the narrative the corporate headquarters wants pushed.

"I've been in the trenches talking about the unemployment rate and working on these fiscal issues for years," [Jason Plummer said.]
Republican policies favor high unemployment so people who own capital can obtain labor more cheaply. That's why Republicans are opposed to working people forming effective labor unions. You notice how Plummer says he's talking about unemployment and not advocating for policies that increase the number of jobs for regular folk?

Plummer works for his family's business, RP Lumber Company, and serves as an intelligence officer in the Navy Reserves.

If Plummer's daddy thinks he's the cat's meow, why doesn't he put junior in charge of the family business? If junior isn't ready to head the family business, why would anyone think he's ready to represent Illinois' Twelfth District in Congress?

For those of us who served in the real military where we have to go where we're ordered, it's a little offensive when rich and connected Republicans get appointed "intelligence" officers in the reserves to bolster their credentials to run for office. Jason Plummer doesn't know shit about being in the military. I challenge him to debate myself or any progressive military veteran. Plummer will come off as a clueless fool.
"If you look at the economic disaster that's occuring right now, I think we need people that have a little big of background in business," Plummer said.
OK, Jaon-whose-daddy-won't-let-him-run-the-family-business, the floor is yours. Based on your extensive business experience, what caused the economic downturn that the United States is currently experiencing?

And, WTF, WSIL! You package Plummer's Republican soundbites without ever making him explain anything. Could you be any more obvious you are shilling for the Republican Party?
Plummer says he will focus on the economy and job creation in this election and favors smaller government. He'd like to repeal President Obama's healthcare plan and slash business regulations.
 Which parts of the Affordable Health Care for America Act would Plummer like to repeal? What is Plummer's plan to control health care costs? Which regulations would Plummer "slash"? Regulations that protect the environment? Regulations that protect workers? Regulations that prevent fraud?
Plummer earned an endorsement from Illinois Conservatives on Tuesday. The group bills itself as a grassroots conservative organization.
Journalism is dead. I'd never heard of "Illinois Conservatives", so I put Wikipedia and Google to work. There is no entry for the organization on Wikipedia, but Illinois Conservatives have a website. The organization which does not list a number of members or past accomplishments has one endorsed candidate: Jason Plummer.

Did WSIL not do a web search on the organization before listing the endorsement? What the fuck do WSIL journalists and producers learn in J-school?

When people ask me why I support Occupy Chicago I observe we have a corrupt and dysfunctional economic system. And the political system and the media that are supposed to serve as checks on the economic system are also corrupt and dysfunctional.

I want to thank WSIL for providing such a clear example of how our corporate media has become corrupt and dysfunctional. Providing an accurate picture of what's happening in elections and public policy is clearly taking a backseat to helping the Republican Party advance its talking points.


* On Politics1.com Kenneth "Bud" Wiezer is listed as a "frequent candidate". This means he's run at least three times. Searching both Open Secrets and the Illinois State Board of Elections I find no evidence that either he raised enough money to create an official committee or that he contributed enough to a cause to be listed as a campaign contributor.

USS St. Louis veterans want the Lou brought to the St. Louis area

USS St. Louis (LKA-116), 1976, from Wikipedia
On of my connections to St. Louis--yes, I live in Chicago; yes, I was raised in Oak Park; and yes, I was born in Urbana--is that I served on USS St. Louis (LKA-116) (Facebook group: USS ST. LOUIS LKA-116 Crew and family).

In fact, I was the navigator and administrative officer for the year or so before the ship was decommissioned on November 2, 1992. If you don't remember that date, it was the first day a Democrat won election as President of the United States since 1976.

Since being decommissioned as a U.S. Navy warship, the Lou has been mothballed as part of the "inactive reserve fleet" in Pearl Harbor, HI. The normal disposition of the ship would be to scrap her, most likely to salvage the metal.

Some Lou veterans would like to see her converted into a museum and commercial facility (shops or a casino). The natural place to do this would be in St. Louis, Missouri.

There are a bunch of logistical, architectural, legal and financial issues that would need be addressed.

But I know from my personal perspective, it would be really cool to have the Lou in the St. Louis area where the veterans of the Lou and their families could have a reunion every year.

Monday, November 28, 2011

Brad Harriman: too clueless for Congress?

While going through Brad Harriman's campaign disclosure forms ("D-2s" in Illinois political junky parlance), I found a contribution from Freeburg High School District 77 for $400 dated October 3, 2010.

Using public funds for political contributions is against the law. This is pretty basic.

Harriman's campaign treasurer was Annabelle Gillespie of Belleville. Guess where Gillespie works? She works (or did work) at the Regional Office of Education.

Doesn't it seem like something should have registered as a problem when Gillespie was entering the information on the D-2? She works at the Regional Office of Education, right? If it were legal to solicit campaign contributions from school districts, why not just tell every school district in St. Clair County to send Harriman's campaign $5,000?

This kind of gaffe shows Harriman to be a weak leader on two fronts. One, Harriman ought to proof read his financial disclosure statements before they are submitted. It's just a few pages. If Harriman can't spot an illegal campaign contribution in a 13-page report (only three or four pages are the contributions), has Harriman got what it takes to be reading the federal budget with a critical eye?

Secondly, Harriman does pick good people. Virtually everyone has areas where their skills are not strong. The way effective leaders deal with this is to hire people who compensate for their own weaknesses.

Harriman seems unable to do this.

Brad Harriman is running in Illinois' Twelfth District (IL-12)

Belleville News-Democrat file photo
Brad Harriman is the former Regional Superintendent of Education for St. Clair County, Illinois. I'd link to Harriman's campaign website or his Wikipedia page, but he doesn't have either.

"Party blessing: Dems endorse Harriman for Congress, Hoffman for House" (Kevin Bersett, BND.com) is dated October 28, 2011. Today is November 28 and there's no evidence that Harriman's campaign has created a website. Also, Harriman is not raising money on Act Blue, a website used by practically all serious candidates running for Congress.

I am supporting Iraq War veteran (Army), Chris Miller in the Democratic primary.

I met Chris when organizing Illinois veterans against the U.S. Senate candidacy of Mark Kirk. I liked Chris from the beginning. He seemed like a good mix of hard-nosed Democrat in politics and thoughtful military veteran on policy.

The more I learned about Brad Harriman, the more I became convinced this guy is a not-especially-talented lackey of the St. Clair County Democratic Party.

From the 1990 to the 2012 election cycles, Harriman never gave a contribution to a federal candidate or political committee big enough to trigger federal reporting requirments.

But Brad Harriman loves his local Democratic Party. He gave the St. Clair County Democratic Central Committee regularly: $400 (Oct., 2000), $200 (Oct., 2001), $280 (Oct., 2003), $280 (Nov., 2004) and $200 (Oct., 2005). But he didn't just give to the SCDCC. In Sept., 2004 Harriman gave $200 to Coroner Rick Stone and in Feb., 2006 he gave $240 to Rosella Wamser's campaign. Wamser proceeded Harriman as Regional Superintendent of Education.

Oh, and Harriman gave $2,000 to his own campaign in July, 2006.

It's hard not to read Harriman's campaign contribution history and not conclude he was a party loyalist and was rewarded with the Regional Superintendent gig. But he doesn't really care about federal politics or even issues.

Serving the district? Caring about issues? These aren't particularly important to Harriman.